The Falklands Regime

On the international arena the Falkland Islands Government were exposed and humiliated. Despite attempts by the British and Falklands governments to prevent the British press running the story, the story did hit the headlines, from London to Buenos Aires. The Falklands was exposed as an outpost of political greed and corruption, where politicians lined their pockets with money from commercial fishing, whilst penguins starved. Gone was the pedestal of moral superiority from which the Falklands had looked down on their South American neighbours for so many years. It had now been officially declared by the Supreme Court that the Falkland Islands Government were corrupt, committing human rights violations in an attempt to cover up the damage which commercial fishing was causing to penguin populations.

Because I had won my case, the Supreme Court had ordered the Falkland Islands Government to pay all my legal fees, on top of their own legal fees and court costs. In all the Supreme Court hearing cost the Falkland Islands tax-payers over £65,000 (US$100,000). I did not have to pay a single penny.

I was flooded by letters of support. The Falklands newspapers carried letters of support from members of the public, but that was nothing to the flood of emails and letters I received from people all over the world congratulating me on my defence of Falklands penguins, and my stand against human rights violations in the Falklands. I was offered money for my story from journalists, and sent money to continue saving penguins. I was also included in the highly prestigious publication “Who’s Who”, in recognition of my work to save penguins in the Falkland Islands.

Despite this, Councillor Mike Summers had made it quite clear at the Public Meeting that the Falklands Regime was not going to let ‘some judge’ alter their plans to stop my work in the Falklands, one way or another. Such arrogance and contempt towards the Chief Justice and the Supreme Court left me in no doubt that to return to the Falklands would put me at great personal risk. The people exposed for corruption wanted revenge, and since the Supreme Court ruling had not stopped them, it was hard to imagine what would. Sooner or later my luck was bound to run out, and they would succeed in framing me for something serious in such a way that I would not be able to prove my innocence.

By contrast the British, Chilean and Argentine governments were all supporting me to monitor and protect penguins in Chile and Argentina. Indeed the British government had offered me over £30,000 (US$45,000) to set up a long-term penguin monitoring programme in South America. Faced with eventual imprisonment at the hands of corrupt government officials in the Falklands, or working with the support of three governments in South America, the choice was easy.

By now I was weary of looking over my shoulder, of continually checking my house in search of false evidence that the Falklands police might have planted, of being unable to start a family for fear of the harassment they would suffer for my beliefs. Working in Chile and Argentina was such a joy. Both countries held a genuine concern for the protection of wildlife, not a desire to set up a phoney front to give the impression of doing something, as was happening in the Falklands. This was evident from the responses to outside monitoring.

Whilst the Falklands Regime tried to frame, deport and even threaten to kill anybody who conducted independent research into their handling of the environment, the governments of Chile and Argentina openly welcomed independent scrutiny. Their conservation efforts were genuine. They had nothing to hide, and hoped to benefit from outside scrutiny that could improve the work they were doing.