The Progressive Personality
A Threat to America
by
Book Cover & Preview Text
What is missing.... in a Progressive Personality? Let us suggest a few things.
We can assume, most accurately in my opinion, from what the Progressive tells us himself. When the progressive speaks of life being unfair, upon what does he or she base this opinion? From what he sees, right? But before we accept what he sees, I need to know the following; I must know from the Progressive, what the Purpose of Life is? I cannot accept what the Progressive sees, if I am not sure that what the Progressive sees is not the illusion of life. If the Progressive is, as I believe, perched upon the lower rung of the Ladder of Life, then chances are good that the Progressive has no idea what the Reality of Life is. Nor would the Progressive have any Knowledge of the Law of Karma. Without this Knowledge, how could I be expected to believe anything the Progressive says?
And of course, it is not possible to "prove" to ones brain that it is wrong. There is no word in or out of Creation that can be used to convey to the brain the "reason" it is wrong. The reason is simple to explain. The brain cannot perceive anything but physical energy. And the MIND is not composed of physical energy. But since the brain will never experience any energy other than physical energy, how weird it is to to imagine that one can use the brain to discover the MIND? To imagine this possibile is insane. Which is the reason I used the designation "SI" as the back part of DM=SI [Defense Mechanism equals Subtle Insanity]. With the brain, the use of the SI part of DM=SI is taking place all the time. The brain is continually "thinking" thoughts that may or may not be ture. For the brain, in other words, the name of a thing is that thing.
The Progressive is pretty much limited to thinking and the brain as his or her primary means of understanding life, which means... the "illusion of life". To experience any aspect of the Esoteric dimensions of Life, one must do so from "within" the Esoteric dimensions themselves. This is not a "sort of", or a "kind of" thing. This is an Absolute thing. The brain can never "experience" anything other than what is physical.... period.
Life is composed of three dimensions. Only one of these is physical. The other two are Esoteric [which simply means they consist of vibrational energies that are too subtle for the physical brain to perceive]. To suggest this two-thrids of Man cannot be known, says what about the person who would suggest such a thing? What such a statement says is that the person himself is unable to do so. But such a statement also tells us where such a person is, relative to the Ladder of Life. An enlightened individual might say, in order to save his or her life that this or that is not true. Nothing at all wrong in doing this, just as long as the enlightened individual does not begin "thinking" that what he or she has denied does not exist. To Know the truth of something is a "gift" one has earned over many , many lifetimes. Once discovered, no one should deny this reality to oneself. Perfectly OK to deny this to those in a position to threaten one [and whose ignorance prevents them from Knowing what one Knows]. But never deny it to oneself.
The Progressive personality is missing, or is greatly diminished in his/her access to CDK&EU. This reduced access to CDK&EU is what causes the Progressive to view life as a "problem" that needs to be corrected. This reduced access to CDK&EU also accounts for the fact that, although the Progressive may be a university History professor, he or she is unable to "learn" the most important lessons of history that tells a normal person that Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, and Progressivism have only brought pain and suffering to people throughout history. This "blind spot" is called in mental health, "Scotoma". I refer to it as DM=SI.
What the Progressive envisions as new is, in actuality, as old as Man himself. What causes the Progressive to mistakenly "think" that what he or she thinks to contribute to the world is new, is D-Think from his or her MIND. And to help the Progressive fulfill his or her Fate Karma for this life, he or she will be blocked from realizing that what he or she thinks is precisely what others have thought throughout history. It is Life that allows each new Progressive to "think" that he is the first Thinker to come up with the D-Think being fed to his brain by his MIND. All ego, all delusional, and all a product of DM=SI.
Am I suggesting that the Progressive is living in a box of delusion thought? All sides of which are mirrors which reflect the greatness and intellectual genius of this Progressive? And each thought reinforces the Delusional Thinking that each thought is original with this Progressive? Yes, indeed I am. This disconnect with reality is DM=SI, and the Progressive has no idea that he or she is a player on a stage: And he is the writer of the play, but it is his MIND that is director, producer, prop master, lighting director, and critic. He has no idea that the script he or she is speaking has been spoken by an endless number of actors over millions of years. The Progressive can read any number of books written about Stalin, and the MIND of the Progressive will only allow the Progressive to "see" what the Progressive "needs" to fulfill his or her own Fate Karma for this life.
Formats
Book Details
About the Book
This book appears to be another in a series of books explaining, or introducing the Esoteric dimensions of Man...... while at the same time using a special "Esoteric Truth" lens to view [expose] a most unusual phenomenon we currently refer to as Progressivism. If you have ever wondered how it is that a conservative and a liberal seem to talk past one another, and neither seems to "hear" what the other is saying.... this book explains what causes this phenomenon. This book also explains how this phenomenon is Psychological, and not something ones brain can explain. The term "Psychological" refers to those dimensions of Man that the brain cannot perceive, think about, or discover. And this may come as a surprise to many? This book is not an easy or quick read. The reason is that most of this book reveals phenomena that is largely denied, ignored, or feared in America today. The Esoteric two-thirds of Man, in other words. That is, the MIND and Spiritual realms "within" Man. And, the author insists, "it is not possible to study Man, and certainly not possible to understand Man while in denial of two-thirds of Man". Perhaps the author has a point?
About the Author
The author pointedly explains that what he "Knows", as he puts it, is intuited and not known intellectually [by his brain and thinking, in other words]. Dr. Patterson, began his present career as an "Esochologist" [someone who works with the Esoteric dimensions of Man from within the Esoteric dimensions themselves], as a secondary career after teaching art for a dozen years. While working at a mid-western university, he experienced a most unusual year, which he describes as: I was either going crazy, or I was becoming a genius? He said of this year that he was experiencing a transformation from being focused almost entirely outside of himself, to being forced to look within himself. The result of this year was his intense desire to begin helping young people discover who they are rather than teaching them how to look at, and do art. Docjp, his moniker on the internet, began pursuing a career in psychology and psychotherapy in 1977, but discovered in the process that this career field was not what he had imagined it to be. Initiated into a Spiritual path in 1972, his life began a constant change that has spanned some 40 years. Docjp speaks of himself as having to write as a means of discovering what is hidden within himself via his intuition.... and makes the point, often, that he is no writer. He seems genuinely surprised that this is his fourth book. And he speaks of his books as "notebooks" in which he jots down thoughts. He recently said: " I still find it fascinating to discover subtle little truths that suddenly pop out at me from behind some words I have written, often causing what I was writing to be subtly less true and in need of being restructured."