Now that the Holy Land
is a region of the Islamic faith and the inhabitants have chosen Islam as a way
of life, the only way the Crusaders can have control over history and
information is to find a way to get back into the Holy Land. Hitler and the Second World War gave them a
good reason to find their way back to the Promised Land. The Jews once lived
across the globe, especially in Europe and the Holy Land, without a state after
the Roman persecution and occupation.
They shared land and space with their Hamish and Semitic brothers
without many problems other than the ones typically seen in multi-cultural
nations. When Hitler of Germany came
onto the scene and began the extermination of the Jews, not even a European
nation did anything significant to stop it.
Many of them, they said, did not want to even associate with these
Semitic beings who smelled of garlic. In
fact, some European nations conspired indirectly because they claimed that
these greedy moneymaking Jews were to blame for their crumbling economies. After the Second World War, Europe became in
love with the Jews and forcefully created the state of Israel in the Holy Land
against the will of Israel’s Islamic siblings.
There is nothing wrong with creating a state of Israel. I only question the Europeans’ sudden love
for and interest in the Jews. Are these
not the same Jews they persecuted? If
you really cared about the Jews having their own state, why did it take
Hitler’s “Final Solution” to remind you of your interest in them? Is there a hidden agenda behind this
benevolent relationship that the Jews need to be aware of? Or are the Jews nothing but a stepping-stone
and a mental extension of the Crusaders back into the Islamic Holy Land?
The Jews had better be careful
not to become the orphan who has lost both parents, and his uncles are turning
him against his older brothers, who are wiser, under the pretext of getting a
bigger share of the inheritance. This in
turn weakens the relationship among the brothers, and the family ends up losing
all the inheritance to the uncles because the young one was not wise enough and
his big brothers have gotten too weak to fight as one. The Europeans have been in the Holy Land to
protect Israel’s sovereignty against his anti-Jewish Islamic neighbors. Wait a
minute -- protect them from what? Is it
from the other children of Abraham, other than the descendants of Isaac and
Jacob, who are also Semites but belonging to the Islamic faith? Or is it the Edomites
from Esau, the senior twin of Jacob, who has made everlasting peace with Jacob
(Gen 33:9-14)? Or is it children of
Ishmael, the older half-brother of Isaac, who buried Abraham along with their
grandfather Isaac (Gen 25:9)? This is
all one family who are meant to inherit the land of their ancestors. Who is the European-controlled United Nations
to create a State of Israel? This is the
United Nations that could not prevent a war in Iraq that they did not approve
of. Is the United Nations genuinely
working for the interest of the Holy Land or against the interest of the Holy
Land, and in whose favor?
I am sure there might be other
ethnic groups like the Palestinians and the Kurds of Iraq that are also
interested in having their own state in the Holy Land. I wonder why the United Nations has not done
for these peoples what they have done for Israel. Maybe Israel is special. But what is the difference between all these
Middle Eastern people in the Holy Land; after all, they have similar variations
in race, and a related language and culture.
Oops, I forgot, the creation of Israel now means disunity in the Holy
Land. The Holy Land is no longer Islamic
if a special state called Israel is a Judaic state, and has the strongest
economy and military in the region. So
the envy and anger against Israel is supposed to lead to a more prominent
presence of the Crusaders and clever Israel is using it as an opportunity to
get more financial, economic and military aid from the Crusaders at the expense
of their Islamic siblings. Now, a
Crusader is not every citizen of the West or Christian nations, but Crusadism is a way of thinking and a system of government
that wants to manipulate history and information to the benefit of the European
establishment, of which the Jews are not really a part. Some of the Jews are called European Jews;
others are called African Jew, but I wonder what the relationship is between
these two groups. So not all Europeans, European nations, or Christians are
Crusaders.
Do the Islamic nations of the
Holy Land really hate Israel? If, so why
would they hate their own blood? After
all, they once lived together under Roman rule. It appears to me that the anger the Muslim
nations have towards Israel is not because of the fact that Israel has a state
or that they are Jews, but the fact that Israel as a creation of the Crusaders
is allowing itself to be an excuse to bring back the domination the Muslims
once got rid of as inhabitants of the Holy Land. I am sure during the wars to clean up the
Holy Land; the Jews did the little role they could to make the expulsion of the
Crusaders possible. But why are the Jews
and the Crusaders now friends against the Muslims?
Now that the Crusaders have
invaded Iraq with the irrelevant United Nation watching, taken over Iraq,
removed Saddam Hussein without finding even a milligram of weapons of mass
destruction, Killed Saddam’s two sons, protected the oil wells, but Iraqi
cultural heritage looted, they are now about to put in a puppet Iraqi
government which is more Crusader-like than Islamic, giving the contracts to
reconstruct Iraq to Crusader companies, and they are now even planning to
invade Iran or Syria, but not the biggest threat, North Korea. What will happen to the Islamic Holy Land and
the relevance of Israel as a Crusader stepping-stone?
This is what will happen. Since the United Na