Parasitic Vs. Non-Parasitic Substrata
by
Book Cover & Preview Text
Copy Of The Latest Version Of A Circular E-Mail Sent,
In Whole Or In Part,
To
Over 2000 Philosophy Professors And Graduate
Students.. . . . . . . . . . . .
I. Introduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
II. Definitions:
Substantial Vs. Insubstantial Substrata. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
III. Why
The Distinction Is Crucial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
A: Cause
Of Skepticism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B: Cosmological
Sterility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
i. Mono-Ousious Vs. Poly-ousious Objects. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ii. Atomistic Vs. Non-Atomistic Corpuscular
Theories = Ultimates
Above
All Division & Internal Change Vs.
Their Opposite . . . . . .
iii. Ontological
Distance: The 4th Dimension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
iv. Hylemorphism Vs. Hylegenemorphism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
v. Two
Errors In Science. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DOCUMENT #2:
An Excerpt From An E-Mail To Budd Hoff
Dated
I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II. History
Of “Thing-In-Itself” Vs. “Thing-In-Another. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
A.
Formats
Book Details
About the Book
Queen of the academic world for 2,000 years, Philosophy has been in disrepute for roughly the last 300 years. It’s said she’s hopelessly barren. Is Philosophy the infertile party, or have all her suitors been sterile?
This book fingers the suitors. It says they rendered themselves impotent by abusing three crucial terms: “substance”, “substratum”, and “existence”. The author spells out their erroneous definitions and presents the correct ones.
With those three terms properly defined, Philosophy gives birth to the “Holy Grail” of Metaphysics: a non-singular solution to the theory of ultimate particles. That’s a theory which so defines the universe’s ultimate constituents as to leave each physically indivisible but divisible in principle and, therefore, capable of internal change without ceasing to be the same ultimate. Concretely defined, such ultimates render Philosophy so fertile, she can give a philosophical but mathematically precise accounting for neutrinos, anti-neutrinos, leptons, quarks, atoms, galaxies, electro-magnetic radiation, gravity, relatively instantaneous travel to all parts of the universe, etc..
This book is a must read for all Philosophy’s genuine devotees. For, in its pages, Philosophy commences her resurrection, the reclamation of her throne, and her race with Science to find Science’s “Holy Grail”: The Theory Of Everything.
About the Author
Born
In this book, the self-educated
author of 14 self-published works presents
avenues of thought down which his mind was lead by thirteen years of
heroically intense inner concentration followed now by twenty-eight years of
moderately intense inner concentration.