The Special Relationship Between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the United States of America

Americans and the British are brothers, hence their Special Relationship. The author explains their bond of brotherhood. Their unique relationship does not depend on the chemistry between the occupant of the White House in Washington and that at Number 10 Downing Street in London. The Special Relationship between America and Britain is not a political pendulum that swings high when there is a warm friendship between an American President and a British Prime Minister; and swings low when the two leaders disagree. The Anglo-American Special Relationship is not based on sentiments or on any values. It is a solid bond constructed on the Eternal Rock of Ages. The basis of the exclusive bond between these two countries are coded in their national emblems - the Great Seal of the USA and the Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom. These insignia are pregnant with mysteries. They demonstrate how Americans and Britons are the descendants of the Lost Tribes of Israel. In the Excursus, the author responds to the criticisms that the British and Americans are not Israelites. American Exceptionalism and Britishness are cloaked in their national crests. Pundits claim Britain must remain in the EU in other to be recognised in Washington. It’s a fallacy. Britain is not like any other European country. Britain’s international role would not be diminished by its exit from the EU. Brexit would rather enhance Britain’s image in global politics. Sir David Tang clarified this issue in his article, Britain should look to East for a prosperous future outside the EU. He argued: “Let us not forget that English remains by far the most important language in the world. Already 300 million Chinese are learning English…. And ditto for the Indians and all the other Asian countries, including Japan, where English is by far the most popular foreign language. Therefore, a Brexit would not isolate Britain into an insignificant island of insular Little Englanders. Britain has many other fish to fry, especially with the provenance of her imperial past and within the Commonwealth.” It is just scaremongering for pundits to suggest Britain must stay in the EU to become relevant in the world. The author explains why Britain must leave the EU. He urges Americans to be wary of the EU. For “a vibrant EU” is not essential to “America’s prosperity and security.” Had Vice President Joe Biden examined what the Prince of Scotland Yard published about European integration before the EU evolved, his speech to the European Parliament on 6 May 2010 would have been different. Brexit would not be a hostile act against Ireland. Neither should Brexit encourage the Scots to leave the UK. For it was an “Anglicanised Irishman of Scotch extraction” who wrote about European Integration decades before the EU was launched. The EU has no ‘soul.’ It is a ‘corpse.’ It is unreasonable for David Cameron to suggest he can reform “a carcass” for Britons to love it. Who adores a dead body? The former President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, claimed: “Europe has always been more than a simple market-place. It's the greatest, and the most successful experiment in economic and political integration in the world.” Dr. Andrew Moravcsik, Director of EU Programme at Princeton University, once suggested, “The European Union is an extraordinary political experiment. It has grown to a supranational polity… governed by an ever-growing set of political institutions....” And Professor Ulrich Beck of London School of Economics also asserted that the EU is “a historically unique form of international community.” The EU is not an extraordinary experiment in economic and political integration that has become most successful. The EU is neither ‘a stunning miracle’ as TIME magazine suggested. EU Supporters and Jean Monnet Professors seemed to have argued for a political integration of European nations, and no one should question them. Experts are seldom good judges. The proper place for the ‘experts' on European integration is not on the judgment seat in Brussels and at Jean Monnet Centres of Excellence, but in the witness chair at a public forum to be cross-examined by the ‘ignorant’ public. The Prince of Detectives, who was adored by Americans, argued: “No one who has much experience of judicial inquiries is ever surprised to find that a case which seems convincing when presented ex-parte, breaks down under cross-examination or is shattered by an opposing evidence.” The EU was destined to develop to fulfil what the Prince of Detectives, who investigated Jack-the-Ripper crimes, published about European integration and its future. The Prince, who was also God’s Barrister, recorded that a confederation of European nations would develop through a great European crisis, and this European confederacy would become a major political feature in history after the restoration of the Jews to Palestine. He has been vindicated. The State of Israel was created in Palestine in 1948. In 1950, the EU developed from the ashes of the Second World War. The Prince described European integration “the vile confederacy of the latter days.” God’s Barrister discredited Darwin’s evolutionary theory. He ‘slaughtered’ ‘Darwin’s Bulldog,’ Professor Huxley, to rescue Prime Minister Gladstone from the ‘jaws’ of the Rottweiler. He defended the most amazing book in the universe when it was under attack by German Rationalists and British liberal theologians. The writer unveils the mystery which is hidden in the generations from Adam to Queen Victoria. He discusses the significance of the British Throne and the implications of the Royal Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton. He questions the competence of the critics of the Bible who are ‘crucifying’ Bible-believing Christians. There is also an irreplaceable union between Americans and the British and the Jews. The author pleads with Americans and Britons not to abandon their senior brother (Judah). What is to become of Palestine in view of the hostilities in that land, and the international out-cry for the division of Jerusalem between the Jews and the Palestinians? The writer deals with this subject.